Call Recording Laws in Maine
Plain-English summary
Maine is a one-party-consent state. Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 710 et seq. permits a participant in a communication to record it.
A participant may record an ordinary phone call in Maine without notifying the other party.
Case law of note
No appellate decision in Maine has materially reshaped the participant-recording rule in recent decades. Lower-court decisions exist but do not change the analytical framework set by the statute and by general federal precedent under § 2511.
Edge cases and special rules
- In-person vs. phone. Same — one-party
- Voicemail. Leaving a message creates the recording at the recipient’s direction; reviewing one’s own voicemail is not interception.
- Vicarious consent. Several federal courts have recognized a parental-consent doctrine permitting a parent to consent on behalf of a minor child (Pollock v. Pollock, 154 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1998)). State law varies; no controlling Maine appellate decision on the question.
- Law enforcement. Court-authorized intercepts are governed by a separate framework and are outside the scope of this page.
- Cross-border calls. Where any participant is in an all-party state, treat the stricter rule as the safer default. See cross-border calls.
Penalties and remedies
Criminal: Class C crime.
Civil: Common-law claims.
Evidence: a recording made in violation of the Maine statute is generally inadmissible in Maine proceedings. Federal § 2515 separately bars use of unlawfully intercepted communications in federal proceedings.
Practical guidance
- If you are recording an ordinary phone call: you may record without notifying the other party, but verbal consent is the safer practice if the recording may be used in a proceeding.
- Suggested opening: See our consent script templates for jurisdiction-specific language.
- If the other party objects: stop recording. Continued recording over an objection is a separate factual question that no consent statute helps you with.
- What to keep: the date and time of the call, the parties’ phone numbers, a description of the consent given (express verbal, continued participation after notice, etc.), and the audio file itself.
Compare to
- New Hampshire
- Vermont
- Massachusetts
- US federal law (the Wiretap Act baseline)
- One-party vs. all-party consent explained
- Cross-border calls